Warmth pumps will present one-fifth of the world’s heating wants by the tip of the last decade if nations observe via on their plans, in keeping with the Worldwide Vitality Company (IEA).

In its first international evaluation of those electrical gadgets, the company says they’ve emerged as “the central expertise within the international transition to safe and sustainable heating”. 

Switching from gasoline boilers and different fossil fuels to warmth pumps is anticipated to chop annual greenhouse gasoline emissions equal to the output of Canada by 2030, the IEA concludes. 

Gross sales have already been surging, notably in Europe, amid inflated international gasoline costs. They’re set to achieve file ranges this yr as many EU nations hand out incentives designed to chop their reliance on gasoline imported from Russia, following its invasion of Ukraine.

The report focuses on the company’s “Introduced Pledges Situation” (APS). This assumes that governments meet all the local weather and power commitments they’ve made in full, together with latest pledges such because the REPowerEU technique to chop reliance on Russian gasoline. 

That is in contrast with the IEA’s “Acknowledged Insurance policies Situation” (STEPS), which solely accounts for insurance policies firmly in place. It additionally appears on the “1.5C Web-Zero Emissions by 2050” (NZE) situation.

The IEA concludes that warmth pumps minimize emissions, improve power safety and – regardless of the necessity for larger upfront funding – minimize prices total, attributable to decrease fossil gasoline use.

Big progress in gross sales

Warmth pumps are at the moment present process a world surge in reputation. The IEA says this has been given a lift by insurance policies and incentives linked to local weather considerations and excessive gasoline costs.

Round one-tenth of worldwide house heating wants had been met by warmth pumps in 2021. Gross sales of warmth pumps elevated by 13% from the earlier yr, with quicker progress charges of 35% seen within the EU.

Because it stands, North America has essentially the most warmth pumps put in and China has the most important market, however the EU – which has been scrambling to chop power ties with Russia since its invasion of Ukraine – is the fastest-growing market.

The IEA says it expects gross sales to hit file ranges this yr in response to the worldwide power disaster. It notes that that is very true in Europe, the place some nations have already seen gross sales double within the first half of the yr, in comparison with 2021.

Warmth pump penetration in Europe is highest in chilly areas corresponding to Norway and Finland, attributable to long-standing authorities assist. The IEA notes that this “undercut[s] the argument that warmth pumps are unsuitable for chilly climates”.

Because the chart under exhibits, Poland and Italy, which have launched giant monetary incentives to encourage heat-pump set up, noticed progress charges of greater than 60% in 2021.

Heat pump sales and growth in the EU (left) and selected member states (right), 2021.
Warmth pump gross sales and progress within the EU (left) and chosen member states (proper), 2021. The blue bars point out the variety of warmth pumps bought, and the yellow dots present the % progress in gross sales between 2020 and 2021. Supply: IEA.

Globally, the report notes that subsidies for warmth pumps are actually obtainable in additional than 30 nations, protecting round 70% of worldwide house heating demand in residential buildings.

Warmth pumps have a mixed capability of greater than 1,000 gigawatts (GW) immediately. By 2030, the IEA says the STEPS would see this double to 2,100GW and APS would end in 2,600GW being deployed . The massive improve in STEPS is attributed to important coverage interventions such because the Inflation Discount Act within the US.

This improve by warmth pumps to embody round one-fifth of heating wants within the APS could be seen within the chart under. It additionally demonstrates the numerous function that heat-pump market enlargement in China is anticipated to have over the approaching decade.

Heat pump capacity growth in buildings by country:region in the STEPS and APS scenarios by 2030, compared to 2021.
Warmth pump capability progress in buildings by nation/area within the STEPS and APS situations by 2030, in comparison with 2021. Supply: IEA.

In an extra situation that’s in keeping with the Paris Settlement goal of limiting international warming to 1.5C (NZE), warmth pump gross sales speed up even quicker and make up one-quarter of heating demand by 2030.

Slicing fossil fuels 

The report emphasises the potential for warmth pumps to rapidly minimize the world’s dependence on gasoline and different fossil fuels. 

Because it stands, greater than one-sixth of worldwide gasoline use is for preserving buildings heat. Within the EU, which is at the moment attempting to wean itself off Russian gasoline, this determine is one-third. 

To chop out Russian imports earlier than 2030 as a part of the REPowerEU plan, the APS suggests the variety of warmth pumps within the EU must triple to achieve 45m models.

With annual warmth pump gross sales set to strategy 7m by 2030 on this situation, consistent with REPowerEU, gasoline consumption within the bloc’s buildings can be minimize by 21bn cubic metres (bcm) by 2030. The IEA factors out that that is roughly equal to fifteen% of Russian imports into the EU in 2021, earlier than the bloc took steps to scale back its fossil gasoline ties with Moscow.

Different nations, corresponding to Japan and South Korea, are additionally closely reliant on imported fossil fuels. The chart under exhibits how a large-scale change to warmth pumps within the APS would increase power safety by considerably chopping the necessity for fossil gasoline imports.

Share of heating in buildings met by imported fossil fuels by fuel in selected regions:countries in the APS by 2030, compared to 2021.
Share of heating in buildings met by imported fossil fuels by gasoline in chosen areas/nations within the APS by 2030, in comparison with 2021. Supply: IEA.

Total, within the APS, international gasoline use in buildings drops by 21% by 2030, saving 160bcm – greater than the mixed annual output of the UK and Norway in 2021. This discount by 2030 is greater than 3 times bigger than seen in STEPS. 

There may be additionally a discount in using oil and coal, the latter of which remains to be employed for heating in some nations corresponding to China and Poland. The usage of these fuels for house and water heating falls by 29% within the APS.

For each gasoline and fossil fuels extra broadly, roughly half of the discount in use by 2030 is attributed to warmth pumps. The rest comes from enhancements to constructing insulation.

These reductions could be seen within the charts under. The left-hand chart exhibits how these adjustments would practically wipe out using coal as a supply of warmth in buildings, decreasing it to what the IEA calls “negligible” ranges.

Fuel consumption, two charts.
The left-hand chart exhibits the change in international power consumption for house and water heating in buildings within the APS by 2030, in comparison with 2021. The suitable-hand chart exhibits the change, in exajoules (EJ), in using completely different fuels between 2021 and 2030. The darkish blue color signifies the portion of this modification that may be attributed to heat-pump enlargement, and the sunshine blue color exhibits the portion that may be attributed to different components corresponding to elevated residence insulation decreasing total power demand. Supply: IEA.

Whereas the IEA notes that scaling up warmth pumps “inevitably” means elevated electrical energy demand, “that is far outweighed by the financial savings in fossil fuels attributable to their a lot better effectivity”. (Within the chart above, warmth pumps increase electrical energy demand by 2EJ by 2030 but additionally minimize demand for coal, oil and gasoline by round 2EJ every.)

The warmth-pump rollout within the APS would add “little” to electrical energy demand in “main heating areas”, pushing it roughly 1.5% to 2.5% larger than 2021 ranges by 2030, in keeping with the IEA. Nevertheless, it provides that this might nonetheless require further funding in capability, buyer connections, distribution grids and adaptability. 

Slicing emissions

Conserving buildings heat produces one-tenth of worldwide energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Lowering using fossil fuels to warmth buildings due to this fact comes with a major emissions discount. 

Within the APS, CO2 emissions from heating buildings drop by 1.2bn tonnes (GtCO2), or greater than 1 / 4. The massive-scale change from boilers fuelled with gasoline and different fossil fuels to warmth pumps is accountable for 500MtCO2 of this discount.

That is practically 2% of all energy-related CO2 emissions immediately. It’s equal to Canada’s emissions footprint in 2021, the IEA notes.

Crucially, emissions would fall although warmth pumps typically depend on fossil gasoline combustion for energy, together with on coal-heavy grids corresponding to China’s. It is because warmth pumps are between three and 5 occasions more efficient than fossil gasoline boilers.

The emissions financial savings additionally account for the leakage of F-gases, potent greenhouse gases that may be launched in the course of the manufacture and use of warmth pumps.

The IEA estimates that warmth pumps at the moment minimize emissions by “at the very least 20%” in comparison with a gasoline boiler “even when operating on emissions-intensive electrical energy”. This may rise to 80% when operating on a cleaner grid.

This may be seen within the determine under, which exhibits Canada for example of a comparatively low-carbon grid and China as one with larger emissions depth due its reliance on coal.

The yellow bars present emissions from a gasoline boiler per unit of warmth delivered. Emissions from a warmth pump with “full leakage” of F-gases into the atmosphere are nonetheless far decrease than the gasoline boiler. The inexperienced bars present emissions from warmth pumps utilizing hydrocarbon-based (HC) refrigerants.

Greenhouse gas emissions per megawatt-hour (MWh) of useful heat output for gas boilers (yellow) and heat pumps (blue and green) depending on different refrigerant options.
Greenhouse gasoline emissions per megawatt-hour (MWh) of helpful warmth output for gasoline boilers (yellow) and warmth pumps (blue and inexperienced) relying on completely different refrigerant choices. The darkish blue bars point out comparatively excessive charges of F-gas leakage, whereas the sunshine blue and inexperienced bars point out lower-emission choices. Supply: IEA.

The chart under left exhibits the general emissions financial savings from house and water heating in buildings underneath the APS. Emissions associated to electrical energy fall although demand for electrical heating rises attributable to warmth pumps, due to the broader shift to low-carbon energy within the APS.

The chart on the proper exhibits that whereas warmth pumps are key for chopping emissions within the APS, power effectivity measures in properties are accountable for a bigger chunk of cuts.

Global CO2 emissions from space and water heating in buildings in the APS, 2021-2030.
World CO2 emissions from house and water heating in buildings within the APS, 2021-2030. Supply: IEA.

Falling prices

Excessive gasoline costs have made warmth pumps way more aggressive towards standard gasoline boilers when it comes to their operating prices, in keeping with the IEA.

Warmth pumps already had decrease operating prices than gasoline boilers in lots of nations earlier than the worldwide power disaster and excessive gasoline costs have elevated this benefit additional, because the chart under exhibits.

The IEA emphasises that for low-income households, financial savings could be 2-6% of their family revenue, that means warmth pumps “can meaningfully tackle power poverty”.

Energy bill savings,$, for households switching to a heat pump from a gas boiler in selected regions:countries, 2021 and 2022.
Vitality invoice financial savings,$, for households switching to a warmth pump from a gasoline boiler in chosen areas/nations, 2021 and 2022. Supply: IEA.

These decrease working prices imply that warmth pumps typically already compete with gasoline boilers on an total price of possession foundation, regardless of larger set up prices. 

The chart under exhibiting the “levelised price” of heating and cooling – together with gear and set up, in addition to working and upkeep prices – demonstrates that air-to-air warmth pumps are already cheaper than gasoline alternate options in a number of main heating markets. 

Some, such because the UK and Canada, nonetheless want subsidies to make warmth pumps cost-competitive.

Levelised cost of heating and cooling,$ per megawatt hour (MWh) of residential air-air and air-water heat pumps and alternatives.
Levelised price of heating and cooling,$ per megawatt hour (MWh) of residential air-air and air-water warmth pumps and alternate options, together with gasoline boilers and gasoline boilers mixed with air con, in chosen nations, 2021. The yellow dots point out the impression of subsidies on levelised prices. Supply: IEA.

Warmth pumps are a extra enticing prospect than gasoline boilers for a lot of causes, the IEA says. Not solely are they three-to-five occasions extra power environment friendly, they’re typically additionally in a position to function air conditioners for the two.6 billion folks dwelling in areas requiring each heating and cooling by 2050.

In distinction, the IEA is dismissive of hydrogen as a low-carbon various to gasoline boilers. The report says it would have a “negligible function” within the house and water heating gasoline mixture of the APS by 2030. It states:

“A key motive is that when accounting for the power losses related to hydrogen conversion, transport and use, hydrogen applied sciences to be used in buildings are a lot much less environment friendly than warmth pumps and different obtainable choices.”

Regardless of the benefits of warmth pumps, the report acknowledges the boundaries posed by their excessive up-front prices. 
Because the chart under exhibits, in a small variety of nations air-to-air warmth pumps can already be cheaper to put in than gasoline boilers, however for essentially the most half the IEA says “subsidies stay key to extend the competitiveness of air-to-water and ground-source models”.

Equipment and installation cost of the cheapest model of main residential heating technologies in selected countries, 2022.
Gear and set up price of the most cost effective mannequin of foremost residential heating applied sciences in chosen nations, 2022. The yellow dots point out the impression of subsidies on prices. Supply: IEA.

Total, the APS requires a “large improve” in spending on gear and set up by constructing house owners – a tripling of funding by 2030 to $350bn. 

That is $160bn greater than the prices of putting in standard heating techniques corresponding to gasoline boilers, the IEA says. Nevertheless, it notes that a lot of this incremental funding is already being lined by authorities incentives. Furthermore, the extra prices shall be paid again by gasoline financial savings:

“[I]ncremental prices [of investing in a switch to heat pumps] are outweighed by the economy-wide financial savings on gasoline, particularly ought to the worldwide power disaster proceed.”

Different advantages

Within the APS, employment within the warmth pump business roughly triples, reaching 1.3 million employees in 2030. 

Knowledgeable evaluation direct to your inbox.

Nevertheless, the report warns of the necessity for coaching programmes, partly lined by public funding, to make sure sufficient employees can be found. It additionally notes that many related expertise are interchangeable with the fossil gasoline heating business, that means folks may very well be retrained.

Lastly, the APS not solely drives down greenhouse gasoline emissions but additionally cuts main air pollution that may be dangerous to peoples’ well being.

Total, the IEA concludes that this pathway would yield a 15-40% discount in such emissions and would additionally minimize different hazards related to gasoline combustion corresponding to carbon monoxide leaks, explosions and fireplace danger.

Sharelines from this story